![ms visual studio ms visual studio](https://windows-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Visual-Studio-Express-Editions_7.png)
- #MS VISUAL STUDIO INSTALL#
- #MS VISUAL STUDIO CODE#
- #MS VISUAL STUDIO LICENSE#
- #MS VISUAL STUDIO PROFESSIONAL#
It's also basically worthless :) I'd stop and ask yourself why you want to use it, because there is nearly no case where your business isn't the big loser with VisualStudio. And VS isn't that fast for development, it's a costly platform to work with in terms of developer productivity.Īre there times that you want to use it? Sure. If you are hosting it, it massively grows your hosting costs. If you are selling it it devalues the value of your software. If you are using it internally, it makes your costs and risks higher. NET centric then? If you are making software, you don't want that kind of lock in. Wouldn't it be better to use something that isn't.
#MS VISUAL STUDIO LICENSE#
I'm hardly a MS license expert, but I think if you fall into that enterprise area with less than $1MM revenue and under 250 PCs/Users, then you can use Community Edition to create your applications.
![ms visual studio ms visual studio](https://devblogs.microsoft.com/visualstudio/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/08/16.3preview2x1.png)
#MS VISUAL STUDIO PROFESSIONAL#
I have 7 guys ( including me ) who basically use the IDE to make console applications and web applications, let's take a hypothetical case where 4 employees installed Visual Studio Express ( I just finished purchasing Visual Studio Professional for each one of them so this is no longer a problem for me) and the remaining 3 have Visual Studio Professional licenses, am I committing an kind of licensing infraction by using the express edition, I ask this, because of that's what one of the Microsoft Partner here said, they said, "You may not use Visual Studio Express for any kind of development activity that gets you paid".
![ms visual studio ms visual studio](https://allpcworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Microsoft-Visual-Studio-2017-15.7.6-Free-Download.jpg)
#MS VISUAL STUDIO INSTALL#
The license is basically saying you cannot install it on something like terminal server or RDS and have multiple developers use the same machine and the same Visual Studio installation. And if you have multiple developers, each one can download and install their own copy. Not sure if the Jobsians stripped lpr out of OSX.Does this mean a company with more than one user can't install it ?.ĭo you have more than 1 developer? The developer is the user of the Visual Studio software, not the rest of your employees. Might even work on one of those cutesy coffee shop laptops. This should work fine from the embedded terminal in VS Code. Typical usage is ```lpr ``` or ```lpr filename -o page-ranges=2-6>```
#MS VISUAL STUDIO CODE#
I also expect the guys at Microsoft to be a little more old school and exercise some common sense.įor those reading this that are fortunate enough to use VS Code on Linux, most Linux distros include the 'lpr' utility by default, which prints to the default system printer. I expect this from the Sublime and Atom crowd. That since most people use electronic devices no one would ever actually want a hard copy. Since they seem to be following in the footsteps of Sublime and Atom on this I am going to assume that some hipster "modern" web developer made the assumption But the lack of a printing functionality is just bone headed and dumb. So are you suggesting that since the program is free we should all just hold hands and drink the kool-aid when it lacks features that even the most basic text editor on the planet should include?